stats Making the Business of Life Easier

   Finance globeinvestor   Careers globecareers.workopolis Subscribe to The Globe
The Globe and Mail/
Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels


  This site         Tips

  The Web Google


  Where to Find It

Breaking News
  Home Page

  Report on Business



Read and Win Contest

Print Edition
  Front Page

  Report on Business




  Arts & Entertainment



  Headline Index

 Other Sections

  Births & Deaths






  Facts & Arguments




  Real Estate









  Food & Dining




  Online Personals

  TV Listings/News

 Specials & Series
  All Reports...

  Where to Find It
 A quick guide to what's available on the site



  Customer Service

  Help & Contact Us



 Web Site

  E-Mail Newsletters

  Free Headlines

  Help & Contact Us

  Make Us Home

  Mobile New

  Press Room

  Privacy Policy

  Terms & Conditions


Saturday, Feb. 4, 2006

It's hard to find a cheap datum
Wednesday, April 3, 2002 – Page A13

With all that's going on in the world, it may seem trivial to write about the price of statistics -- Canadian statistics, no less. But some important Canadian data are too expensive and that's harming our ability to create new jobs and new wealth in the knowledge economy.

It's a good time to be thinking about the price of this data because we're just at the beginning of a new census cycle. That is, the census of Canada, an important undertaking of the federal government to count just about anything worth counting in the country.

Letter to the editor
Re It's Hard To Find A Cheap Datum by David Akin (April 3):
The article alleges that the data Statistics Canada collect are viewed as a potential money-maker for the state. This is not the case at Statistics Canada, which only recovers the cost of providing data that are supplied for specialized private use.

The agency has, over many years, steadily increased the amount of data it provides without charge, most notably since the introduction of the Internet.

A key objective of our data dissemination program is to have the widest possible use of our information without charge. This is certainly the case for the 2001 Census. In addition to our Web site, data from the census and other statistical programs are also made available without charge through Canada's network of more than 700 depository libraries.

The agency does charge in certain cases. First, we charge for products we would not produce if their cost were not recovered. Second, we charge for custom services in which a data user requests a specific output to meet some individual need. To do otherwise would be unfair to taxpayers at large.

Moreover, by adapting the electronic resources it uses to provide commercial services, Statistics Canada has been able to offer more data at no cost to the public.

MARTIN PODEHL, marketing and information services branch, Statistics Canada,

Last month, Statistics Canada released details on the population of Canada. You'll recall the release was front-page news, mostly because the count showed that Canada is growing at an anemic pace and some parts of the country, mostly rural areas, are actually shrinking.

This information will play a central part in the forward planning of organizations as diverse as municipal police departments, charitable organizations and Fortune 500 multinationals.

But that was just the first statistical snapshot. Over the next year or two, Statscan will release much more data from the 2001 census. Lots of that information will be made available for free, but a great deal of important data, valuable to all sorts of organizations across the country, will be made available only to those willing to pay a great deal for it.

In fact, if you wanted to get detailed figures on household income, dwelling type, education and other variables on a street-by-street, across-the-country basis, you could pay Statscan more than $10,000 for the privilege.

By contrast, the same kind of data, with similar amounts of detail, for the United States can be purchased from the U.S. Census Bureau for as little as $100.

But that's not all. There is also a great disparity between us and the U.S. for the cost of digital versions of street maps. A Canadian set can cost as much as $25,000 and will include only built-up, urban areas; a full set of U.S. maps, including urban and rural areas, costs $2,000 (U.S.).

Having these two sets of data -- digital street maps and census data -- lets anyone with a personal computer and some cheap software figure out how best to deploy scarce resources, find new business opportunities, or conduct research into the ways Canadian society is organized.

This data -- geographic locations and lists of things such as people and houses -- is called geospatial data, and there's a small but thriving industry of geospatial data users in Canada who are trying to push federal policymakers toward the idea that raw data about our country ought to be made available for as close as possible to free, and that such a policy would have immense benefits for all of us.

In the U.S., data collected by the public's representatives -- the government -- about the public are viewed as the public's good. The job of government, in the U.S. at least, is to get this information into the hands of the public with as little fuss as possible.

It feels different in Canada. The data collected by the public's representative here are viewed as a potential moneymaker for the state, and that's wrong. They're our data and our government ought to give them to us.

GeoConnections, a federally funded organization, commissioned a study last year that examined Canada's geospacial data dissemination policies. The report, prepared by KPMG Consulting for the GeoConnections committee, concluded that the government does a poor job getting data it collects about the country into the hands of those who could make some use of it. "Decisions are taken without using the best available data because the cost of the data exceeds valuable budgets and/or perceived value. In some instances, effective, timely and economic decision-making is hindered. . . . The outcome is inferior decision-making in both the public and private sectors."

This is important because the most senior members of the Chrétien government have made it a priority to nurture a knowledge economy that generates wealth from bits and bytes, yet the federal government is hoarding one of the most precious resources to build a knowledge economy.

Some studies say that, for every dollar invested in distributing geospacial, census-based data, users of that data generate $4 in growth, mostly by improved resource allocation.

KPMG had some common-sense proposals, the most sensible of which was this: The main goal of Canada's data dissemination policies should be to increase the use of the data. It should not be to balance a departmental budget or earn revenue. A bureaucrat's success should be measured by the number of kilobytes moved out the door, not by the size of a departmental bank balance.

The responding agencies -- Statscan et al. -- are still thinking about it.
David Akin is national business and technology correspondent for CTV News and a contributing writer to The Globe and Mail.

7-Day Site Search

Census home

Today's Weather


Michael Posner
Ethnic laugh lines
Jeffrey Simpson
Health care: Do we know better than everyone else?

Paul Knox
The rise of anti-anti-Americanism


space  Advertisement

Statistics Canada
2001 Census links

•  A profile of the Canadian population - main page 
•  Public consultation 
•  Content of the questionnaires 
•  The 2001 Census questionnaire (PDF) 
•  Reasons why the questions are asked 
•  Collection 
•  Data processing 
•  Data release dates 
•  2001 Census Preview of Products and Services 
•  Privacy 
•  Confidentiality 
Links will open in a new browser window

Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels

© 2003 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Help & Contact Us | Back to the top of this page