stats
globeinteractive.com: Making the Business of Life Easier

   Finance globeinvestor   Careers globecareers.workopolis Subscribe to The Globe
The Globe and Mail /globeandmail.com
Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels
space


Search

space
  This site         Tips

  
space
  The Web Google
space
   space



space

  Where to Find It


Breaking News
  Home Page

  Report on Business

  Sports

  Technology

space
Subscribe to The Globe

Shop at our Globe Store


Print Edition
  Front Page

  Report on Business

  National

  International

  Sports

  Arts & Entertainment

  Editorials

  Columnists

   Headline Index

 Other Sections
  Appointments

  Births & Deaths

  Books

  Classifieds

  Comment

  Education

  Environment

  Facts & Arguments

  Focus

  Health

  Obituaries

  Real Estate

  Review

  Science

  Style

  Technology

  Travel

  Wheels

 Leisure
  Cartoon

  Crosswords

  Food & Dining

  Golf

  Horoscopes

  Movies

  Online Personals

  TV Listings/News

 Specials & Series
  All Reports...

space

Services
   Where to Find It
 A quick guide to what's available on the site

 Newspaper
  Advertise

  Corrections

  Customer Service

  Help & Contact Us

  Reprints

  Subscriptions

 Web Site
  Advertise

  E-Mail Newsletters

  Free Headlines

  Globe Store New

  Help & Contact Us

  Make Us Home

  Mobile New

  Press Room

  Privacy Policy

  Terms & Conditions


GiveLife.ca

    

PRINT EDITION
Tony Gilroy today vs. two decades ago
space
The prolific screenwriter behind the Bourne franchise revisits one of his first works with the finally produced political thriller Beirut
space
By BARRY HERTZ
  
  

Email this article Print this article
Wednesday, April 11, 2018 – Page A14

At first glance, Tony Gilroy does not seem like a writer familiar with the concept of "development hell." One of the most prolific scribes in the film industry, Gilroy's name can be found at the top of everything from the Bourne franchise to Rogue One: A Star Wars Story to Michael Clayton (which he also directed). Yet the 61-year-old New Yorker has also spent the past two decades carrying around one of his first scripts: Beirut. Until now, that is. On Friday, the Middle East thriller - set in 1982, at the height of IsraeliPalestine Liberation Organization tensions - finally makes its way to theatres, with Jon Hamm starring and Brad Anderson (The Machinist) directing. The Globe and Mail spoke with Gilroy about the gap, the industry and what it takes to rewrite a younger version of yourself.

Beirut opens as a bit of an outlier. It's not based on a novel, there's no franchise aspirations, there's no intellectual property attached.

I know! Do you think we'll find an audience? It's interesting.

Well, are you skeptical that it will?

I would that say my entire experience on this film has been one of surprised incredulity all the way down the line. In a pleasing way, but if [it found an audience] that would be the final bit of miracle. I wrote this back in 1991, so it's quite a miracle for me that it's finally been made.

What inspired the idea?

On the very first movie I ever made, The Cutting Edge, which was shooting in Toronto, I was on the set there. And the producer, Robert W. Cort, had been in the CIA as an analyst. We were reading the same books, both of us fascinated with the Middle East, and so after that I spent a year writing this script, in 199091, just researching and writing.

You couldn't actually get on the ground in Beirut at the time and we were preinternet, but my office became a warren of Beirut for a year, filled with boxes and boxes of research.

And then, the two-decade-plus gap happened.

It was a popular script at the time and a lot of A-list people flirted with it over the years. It got me a lot of attention and became a great calling card. But two things happened. First, the politics seemed much more inflammatory at the time. The portrayal of Israel, of the PLO, the Reagan White House. There were not a lot of heroes in the film and that was much more radioactive in the nineties, so people got spooked. The second thing was, I was writing in 1990 or 91 about 1982, and a 10-year callback is not a very interesting lens. And again, my research was library clippings, books. Twenty years later, when the producers said they had Jon and Brad, I went back and read it again and knew I needed to make another pass at it. There's a lot more literature now about what happened and what had been red meat to some people 20 years ago was now almost quaint. Plus, all of a sudden, 1982 looked sort of sexy.

Is that unusual, though, getting the chance to go back at a script that's been passed around for 20 years?

I like to think I'm as steeped in screenwriter history as most anyone you would talk to and I'm sure something like this has happened before, but I don't know the analog to it, no. I ended up spending 10 weeks on the rewrite, not changing the plot or adding or subtracting characters, but more granular work. I'd tell my wife I'm collaborating with myself over a 20-year period, rewriting the younger version of myself. I was both impressed with what I'd done and irritated with the younger version of me.

Did you find that you're more of, say, a cynical writer today than you were back then?

It was two things: There was a level of proficiency that appears to be slicked through the writing, which I was embracing then. It was orchestrating scenes around lines, like "I have a great line, and I have to protect it," and then perverting the truth of things to get at something that I thought was really slick. That's been beaten out of me since. You learn to trust the camera more, the actors more. The other thing is more substantial, in that I was a young man writing about disappointment. I knew what it looked like, but I didn't know how it felt. It seemed more voyeuristic, whereas I was able to inhabit it in a more organic way this time.

Do you think the reason this finally got made is because it's a lower-budget effort than it once was intended to be?

This was supposed to be a Peter Weir film, a Wolfgang Petersen film, starring Michael Douglas or Mel Gibson. It was going to be an expensive early-nineties prestige studio picture. Sydney Pollack or maybe John Frankenheimer! Part of my feelings of incredulity here was when the producers came back to me with Jon and Brad, I was like, "Great! But you want to make it for only how much?" I didn't think it was going to happen and I didn't want it to look malnourished. But none of those things happened.

They bedazzled me every step of the way. The fact that they pulled this off, I'm very impressed.

How much of your surprise is also tied into the current landscape right now, especially for adulttargeted dramas with no IP?

You know exactly how ghettoized the marketplace is right now. But [distributor] Bleecker Street is confident. We took it out to [Sundance], not to sell it, but to show it, and we got nice reviews. Jon feels like a giant movie star here. But I don't know.

Maybe we'll sneak it through.

Maybe this can be a nice little unicorn for this quarter. I see the same things you see - this is not a slam dunk by any measure.

This interview has been edited and condensed.

Beirut opens April 13.

Associated Graphic

Tony Gilroy attends the Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah, in January. This Friday, one of Gilroy's first scripts, Beirut, written in 1991, will finally make its way into theatres.

TOMMASO BODDI/GETTY IMAGES FOR IMDB


Huh? How did I get here?
Return to Main Rex_Murphy Page
Subscribe to
The Globe and Mail
 

Email this article Print this article

space  Advertisement
space

Need CPR for your RSP? Check your portfolioís pulse and lower yours by improving the overall health of your investments. Click here.

Advertisement

7-Day Site Search
    

Breaking News



Today's Weather


Inside

Rick Salutin
Merrily marching
off to war
Roy MacGregor
Duct tape might hold
when panic strikes


Editorial
Where Manley is going with his first budget




space

Columnists



For a columnist's most recent stories, click on their name below.

 National


Roy MacGregor arrow
This Country
space
Jeffrey Simpson arrow
The Nation
space
Margaret Wente arrow
Counterpoint
space
Hugh Winsor  arrow
The Power Game
space
 Business


Rob Carrick arrow
Personal Finance
space
Drew Fagan arrow
The Big Picture
space
Mathew Ingram arrow
space
Brent Jang arrow
Business West
space
Brian Milner arrow
Taking Stock
space
Eric Reguly arrow
To The Point
space
Andrew Willis arrow
Streetwise
space
 Sports


Stephen Brunt arrow
The Game
space
Eric Duhatschek arrow
space
Allan Maki arrow
space
William Houston arrow
Truth & Rumours
space
Lorne Rubenstein arrow
Golf
space
 The Arts


John Doyle arrow
Television
space
John MacLachlan Gray arrow
Gray's Anatomy
space
David Macfarlane arrow
Cheap Seats
space
Johanna Schneller arrow
Moviegoer
space
 Comment


Murray Campbell arrow
Ontario Politics
space
Lysiane Gagnon arrow
Inside Quebec
space
Marcus Gee arrow
The World
space
William Johnson arrow
Pit Bill
space
Paul Knox arrow
Worldbeat
space
Heather Mallick arrow
As If
space
Leah McLaren arrow
Generation Why
space
Rex Murphy arrow
Japes of Wrath
space
Rick Salutin arrow
On The Other Hand
space
Paul Sullivan arrow
The West
space
William Thorsell arrow
space





Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels
space

© 2003 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Help & Contact Us | Back to the top of this page