stats
globeinteractive.com: Making the Business of Life Easier

   Finance globeinvestor   Careers globecareers.workopolis Subscribe to The Globe
The Globe and Mail /globeandmail.com
Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels
space


Search

space
  This site         Tips

  
space
  The Web Google
space
   space



space

  Where to Find It


Breaking News
  Home Page

  Report on Business

  Sports

  Technology

space
Subscribe to The Globe

Shop at our Globe Store


Print Edition
  Front Page

  Report on Business

  National

  International

  Sports

  Arts & Entertainment

  Editorials

  Columnists

   Headline Index

 Other Sections
  Appointments

  Births & Deaths

  Books

  Classifieds

  Comment

  Education

  Environment

  Facts & Arguments

  Focus

  Health

  Obituaries

  Real Estate

  Review

  Science

  Style

  Technology

  Travel

  Wheels

 Leisure
  Cartoon

  Crosswords

  Food & Dining

  Golf

  Horoscopes

  Movies

  Online Personals

  TV Listings/News

 Specials & Series
  All Reports...

space

Services
   Where to Find It
 A quick guide to what's available on the site

 Newspaper
  Advertise

  Corrections

  Customer Service

  Help & Contact Us

  Reprints

  Subscriptions

 Web Site
  Advertise

  E-Mail Newsletters

  Free Headlines

  Globe Store New

  Help & Contact Us

  Make Us Home

  Mobile New

  Press Room

  Privacy Policy

  Terms & Conditions


GiveLife.ca

    

PRINT EDITION
Video review works, and it's going to ruin the World Cup
space
space
By CATHAL KELLY
  
  

Email this article Print this article
Monday, June 18, 2018 – Page B11

Wuick quiz - who scored France's regulation goal in the 2006 World Cup final? And who was the French guy who head-butted the Italian guy?

One was a correct soccer thing and the other was a flagrantly illegal one, but people recall only one of them. It's as memorable as the moon landing.

If you think hard about the World Cup's most standout events, there's a lot of that.

Diego Maradona punching the ball toward goal; referee Byron Moreno going Three Mile Island in added extra time; Patrick Battiston getting his face stoved in by a flying, unpenalized hip check.

None of those things should have happened. Having happened, they should not have been gotten away with.

But they did and often were and thank God for that. Sport is at its best when things are going terribly wrong. It's the disasters that pull people together in harmless rage.

Thanks to the introduction of video assistant referee (VAR), that's over now.

Welcome to the Brave New World Cup, where all thinking is right thinking.

We had heard a lot about VAR in the lead-up, but since few had gotten a look at how it operated in real life, a couple of things have taken us by surprise.

First, that the officials sitting in an air-conditioned video control room do so in their full, onfield uniform.

Second, that they actually intended to use the thing.

VAR first came to our attention during Saturday's FranceAustralia game. Antoine Griezmann was brought down in the box. No foul was called. Play continued.

A few seconds later, after being alerted by Big Brother back in Moscow, the referee stopped play and went over to the sidelines to reconsider his choices.

After staring at a monitor for a while, he called the penalty shot.

Griezmann scored. That was the difference in France's 2-1 win.

Theoretically, this is all better.

Griezmann was fouled, though not obviously. Once you watched it in slow motion, you could see it was a penalty. Even the Australians couldn't muster much outrage after the fact.

But all of this is contrary to the spirit of soccer, a game that does not stop for anything short of serious injury. That relentlessness is a big part of what separates soccer from every other sport on Earth, all of which are infected by long pauses.

Another keystone of soccer is that the referee is always right, even when he or she is wrong.

The heart of the Laws of the Game is that the referee has "full authority." This dissonance is baked in because, while it is not always fair, it applies equally to either side. It adds an element of fallibility that gives the game its tension.

It's what makes an activity practised by superhumans relatable to the rest of us. Because screwups are part of life.

In some ways, mistakes are the foundation of the game - making them and taking advantage of them. If 22 people on the field are allowed that freedom, why should we expect a different standard from the 23rd?

VAR does that. With assistance from the eye in the sky, the referee is now omniscient.

If he muddles something, he gets a do-over. Eventually, the "referee" may as well be an intercom system yelling down calls from a loudspeaker.

You can already see the new system amplifying the game's worst complaining instincts. After Switzerland scored on Sunday, Brazil's players repeatedly - and ridiculously - pointed upward.

They were hoping to be saved from above by instant replay.

In the early going, VAR has gotten an approving, if not quite enthusiastic, nod from most observers. Even its critics can't verbalize why they dislike it. After all, it is working. It is demonstrably fair.

The problem they can't put their finger on is that fairness as an absolute has no place in our games. You can hope for it, but beware of what happens when you achieve it.

If you take all unfairness out of sport, what you have left is a skills showcase. There is a reason people don't pay to watch Lionel Messi knocking balls into a net from the halfway line during practice.

There is no theatre in watching Messi being good at soccer. There is an enormous amount of it watching him do so while things have the potential of going sideways around him. He made one impression in his first game in Russia - by fluffing a penalty. That miss has got the world talking. No one's chattering about the game's result, which was very fair.

By Sunday, media outlets had gone on a binge rewriting history with VAR time-warped back into the picture.

England might have won in 1986 (but Maradona would not have become the world's most beloved villain).

Italy might've won in 2002 (but the country would lose the one thing they can all agree on - that Moreno jobbed them).

Spain might've won in 1994 (but we'd have missed out on one of sport's greatest bungles - Roberto Baggio's moonshot penalty in the final).

The results might've been more correct in the strictest sense. But we'd all have been robbed of something more important - true drama, the sort that can only be produced when something goes awry.

This goes beyond score lines.

Winning is wonderful, but the bitterness of having victory stolen from you is more compelling.

That sense of thwartedness brings a community together in ways no trophy can.

There are only so many times you can dissect a great goal with any zeal (more than once makes you "that guy"). Twelve years later, I am still coming nearly to blows with people arguing that Zinedine Zidane was right to give Marco Materazzi the old Marseilles handshake. VAR wouldn't have changed the result, but it would have made Zidane think twice about doing it.

France won on Saturday. That was right. Would it not be more interesting if they'd tied instead and were now in danger of the typical French reaction - turning on each other?

We used to say about these things, "Well, we'll never know," and then spend a pleasurable hour at a bar or a kitchen table bickering gently about how it could have gone down.

Now we know, and have lost something fundamental in so doing.


Huh? How did I get here?
Return to Main William_Houston Page
Subscribe to
The Globe and Mail
 

Email this article Print this article

space  Advertisement
space

Need CPR for your RSP? Check your portfolio’s pulse and lower yours by improving the overall health of your investments. Click here.

Advertisement

7-Day Site Search
    

Breaking News



Today's Weather


Inside

Rick Salutin
Merrily marching
off to war
Roy MacGregor
Duct tape might hold
when panic strikes


Editorial
Where Manley is going with his first budget




space

Columnists



For a columnist's most recent stories, click on their name below.

 National


Roy MacGregor arrow
This Country
space
Jeffrey Simpson arrow
The Nation
space
Margaret Wente arrow
Counterpoint
space
Hugh Winsor  arrow
The Power Game
space
 Business


Rob Carrick arrow
Personal Finance
space
Drew Fagan arrow
The Big Picture
space
Mathew Ingram arrow
space
Brent Jang arrow
Business West
space
Brian Milner arrow
Taking Stock
space
Eric Reguly arrow
To The Point
space
Andrew Willis arrow
Streetwise
space
 Sports


Stephen Brunt arrow
The Game
space
Eric Duhatschek arrow
space
Allan Maki arrow
space
William Houston arrow
Truth & Rumours
space
Lorne Rubenstein arrow
Golf
space
 The Arts


John Doyle arrow
Television
space
John MacLachlan Gray arrow
Gray's Anatomy
space
David Macfarlane arrow
Cheap Seats
space
Johanna Schneller arrow
Moviegoer
space
 Comment


Murray Campbell arrow
Ontario Politics
space
Lysiane Gagnon arrow
Inside Quebec
space
Marcus Gee arrow
The World
space
William Johnson arrow
Pit Bill
space
Paul Knox arrow
Worldbeat
space
Heather Mallick arrow
As If
space
Leah McLaren arrow
Generation Why
space
Rex Murphy arrow
Japes of Wrath
space
Rick Salutin arrow
On The Other Hand
space
Paul Sullivan arrow
The West
space
William Thorsell arrow
space





Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels
space

© 2003 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Help & Contact Us | Back to the top of this page