stats Making the Business of Life Easier

   Finance globeinvestor   Careers globecareers.workopolis Subscribe to The Globe
The Globe and Mail /
Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels


  This site         Tips

  The Web Google


  Where to Find It

Breaking News
  Home Page

  Report on Business



Subscribe to The Globe

Shop at our Globe Store

Print Edition
  Front Page

  Report on Business




  Arts & Entertainment



   Headline Index

 Other Sections

  Births & Deaths






  Facts & Arguments




  Real Estate









  Food & Dining




  Online Personals

  TV Listings/News

 Specials & Series
  All Reports...


   Where to Find It
 A quick guide to what's available on the site



  Customer Service

  Help & Contact Us



 Web Site

  E-Mail Newsletters

  Free Headlines

  Globe Store New

  Help & Contact Us

  Make Us Home

  Mobile New

  Press Room

  Privacy Policy

  Terms & Conditions


Putin and Xi are gambling with their countries' futures

Email this article Print this article
Saturday, August 17, 2019 – Page O3

MOSCOW -- Professor of international affairs at The New School. Her latest book (with Jeffrey Tayler) is In Putin's Footsteps: Searching for the Soul of an Empire Across Russia's Eleven Time Zones.

Continuing street protests in Hong Kong and Moscow have no doubt spooked the authoritarian duo of Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The Moscow protests, the largest in many years, must be keeping Mr. Putin up at night, or they wouldn't be dispersed with such unabated brutality. Yet, rather than hold a dialogue with the people, Mr. Putin has been demonstrating that he is in control, even preening for photos in a tight leather outfit with his favourite motorcycle gang.

Nonetheless, the demonstrations have become a poignant sign of Mr. Putin's declining popularity, including among Russian elites, whose views matter in ways that other forms of public opinion do not. For two decades, the Russian elite's rival factions have generally seen Mr. Putin as the ultimate guarantor of their interests - particularly their financial interests. But as Russia's economy has sunk into sanctions-induced stagnation, Mr. Putin's leadership has started to look like more of a roadblock than a guardrail. Fewer and fewer Russians still accept that "Putin is Russia and Russia is Putin," a mantra that one heard regularly just five years ago, following the Kremlin's annexation of Crimea.

Moreover, Mr. Putin's hope that U.S. President Donald Trump would improve relations with Russia has begun to look shortsighted, if not downright delusional. Although Mr. Trump has weakened American institutions and undermined Western alliances, which has played into Mr. Putin's hands, the White House has also rendered U.S. foreign policy utterly unpredictable. Worse, the Trump administration is now systematically unwinding the armscontrol accords that long brought some degree of certainty to nuclear affairs.

Russian elites know that their country is as ill-prepared to win a nuclear-arms race with the U.S.

now as the Soviet Union was in previous decades. The recent explosion of a nuclear-missile engine at a test site on Russia's northern Arctic coast is a grim reminder of a deep-seated incompetence. And, unlike Mr. Putin, Russian elites are deeply worried that alienating the U.S. will make Russia a de facto vassal state vis-àvis China.

The protests in Hong Kong, which show no sign of abating, are likewise the product of authoritarian overreach. They began with a proposed law that would allow Hong Kong citizens and residents to be extradited to the Chinese mainland. Given how clumsily the legislation was presented by Hong Kong's Beijingbacked leader, Carrie Lam, it is possible the Chinese leadership was only dimly aware of it and its potential political impact. Nonetheless, the Chinese government's response to the protests has been increasingly self-defeating.

For starters, the People's Liberation Army has been openly threatening to intervene to shut down the protests against Ms.

Lam's government. And in cases where pro-government "triad" thugs, most likely based on the mainland, have shown up to assail protesters, the police have been conveniently absent. As everyone in Hong Kong knows, these extrajudicial beatings had to have been sanctioned by Mr.

Xi's government.

More ominously, Mr. Xi may have already decided that the time for "one country, two systems" has passed. China, he might argue, can no longer tolerate a functioning quasi-democracy within its territory, despite the agreement it accepted as a condition of Hong Kong's return to Chinese sovereignty in 1997. Concerned about Taiwan and its political drift ever further from the mainland, Mr. Xi may be thinking that a harsh Hong Kong policy will scare the Taiwanese into line.

If so, he has forgotten that bullying Taiwan has only ever yielded the opposite of what China intended.

Then again, Mr. Xi may be contemplating something even worse. If he has concluded that Mr. Trump's "America First" administration would do nothing to protect Taiwan, he could be considering a lightning military strike on the island to bring it back under the mainland's control. This, too, would be a mistake.

Given the broader context of Sino-American relations, even the Trump administration would likely respond to Chinese military adventurism in Taiwan.

Besides, the U.S. need not engage in an open military confrontation with China to make aggression toward Taiwan more trouble than it's worth. The U.S. Navy still has the capacity to cut off the sea lanes supplying energy and minerals to China, regardless of whether it is actively engaged in the South China Sea.

As with Mr. Putin, overreach seems to be Mr. Xi's default position nowadays, judging by his handling of the trade war and aggressive behaviour toward China's neighbours. In fact, Mr. Xi's muscle-flexing has been so heedless that China now finds itself increasingly isolated diplomatically. Almost all the world's leading military and economic powers - the European Union, India, Japan, Brazil - maintained pragmatic relations with Mr. Xi's predecessors.

But they have since grown increasingly wary of China, with some even moving closer to the United States (in the age of Trump, no less).

As in Russia's case, China's elite will no doubt have noticed that Mr. Xi is turning the country into an international pariah. The outside world may assume that China's senior leadership is as subservient to Mr. Xi as the Kremlin is to Mr. Putin. But that is also what many thought about the Soviet politburo and Nikita Khrushchev back in 1964. Mr. Khrushchev was ousted before the end of the year.

There is an old joke in which the long-serving Soviet foreign minister, Andrei Gromyko, quips, "We had to remove Khrushchev.

He was so reckless a gambler, we would be lucky to hang on to Moscow if he continued." Mr. Khrushchev was indeed impulsive when he precipitated the Cuban Missile Crisis. But he was motivated by a desire to maintain military parity with the U.S. He did not share the Stalinesque delusions of grandeur that seem to be driving Mr.

Putin and Mr. Xi to wager their own countries' futures.

Today, no one should assume that either leader will be spared Mr. Khrushchev's fate, or even Stalin's grim death, which was long rumoured to have been perpetrated by his own entourage, whose members had tired of his despotic overreach.

Associated Graphic

From left: Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, President Vladimir Putin and Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu attend a ceremony in Moscow in May. The Russian government under Mr. Putin has proved no less secretive or vindictive than the Soviet regime in which he was trained.


Huh? How did I get here?
Return to Main Rick_Salutin Page
Subscribe to
The Globe and Mail

Email this article Print this article

space  Advertisement

Need CPR for your RSP? Check your portfolio’s pulse and lower yours by improving the overall health of your investments. Click here.


7-Day Site Search

Breaking News

Today's Weather


Rick Salutin
Merrily marching
off to war
Roy MacGregor
Duct tape might hold
when panic strikes

Where Manley is going with his first budget



For a columnist's most recent stories, click on their name below.


Roy MacGregor arrow
This Country
Jeffrey Simpson arrow
The Nation
Margaret Wente arrow
Hugh Winsor  arrow
The Power Game

Rob Carrick arrow
Personal Finance
Drew Fagan arrow
The Big Picture
Mathew Ingram arrow
Brent Jang arrow
Business West
Brian Milner arrow
Taking Stock
Eric Reguly arrow
To The Point
Andrew Willis arrow

Stephen Brunt arrow
The Game
Eric Duhatschek arrow
Allan Maki arrow
William Houston arrow
Truth & Rumours
Lorne Rubenstein arrow
 The Arts

John Doyle arrow
John MacLachlan Gray arrow
Gray's Anatomy
David Macfarlane arrow
Cheap Seats
Johanna Schneller arrow

Murray Campbell arrow
Ontario Politics
Lysiane Gagnon arrow
Inside Quebec
Marcus Gee arrow
The World
William Johnson arrow
Pit Bill
Paul Knox arrow
Heather Mallick arrow
As If
Leah McLaren arrow
Generation Why
Rex Murphy arrow
Japes of Wrath
Rick Salutin arrow
On The Other Hand
Paul Sullivan arrow
The West
William Thorsell arrow

Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels

© 2003 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Help & Contact Us | Back to the top of this page