stats Making the Business of Life Easier

   Finance globeinvestor   Careers globecareers.workopolis Subscribe to The Globe
The Globe and Mail /
Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels


  This site         Tips

  The Web Google


  Where to Find It

Breaking News
  Home Page

  Report on Business



Subscribe to The Globe

Shop at our Globe Store

Print Edition
  Front Page

  Report on Business




  Arts & Entertainment



   Headline Index

 Other Sections

  Births & Deaths






  Facts & Arguments




  Real Estate









  Food & Dining




  Online Personals

  TV Listings/News

 Specials & Series
  All Reports...


   Where to Find It
 A quick guide to what's available on the site



  Customer Service

  Help & Contact Us



 Web Site

  E-Mail Newsletters

  Free Headlines

  Globe Store New

  Help & Contact Us

  Make Us Home

  Mobile New

  Press Room

  Privacy Policy

  Terms & Conditions


Ontario, Toronto battle threatens municipal vote
City clerk warns ability to administer fair election on Oct. 22 could be jeopardized by escalating fight over plan to halve the size of council in Canada's largest city

Email this article Print this article
Friday, September 14, 2018 – Page A1

Toronto's city clerk is warning that her ability to administer a fair municipal election for Oct. 22 could be in jeopardy because of uncertainty resulting from the escalating battle between the province and Canada's largest city over cutting council almost in half.

And at the same emergency council meeting on Thursday, local politicians voted to ask the federal government to employ a little-used constitutional power that could allow Ottawa to quash the effort to downsize council.

That power, however, has not been used since 1943.

The councillors also instructed city lawyers to exhaust every legal avenue in council's battle against the Premier's move to reduce the number of council seats to 25 from 47.

They also vowed to fight Premier Doug Ford's unprecedented use of the notwithstanding clause to override a court ruling that declared his legislation, brought forward in the middle of an election campaign, unconstitutional.

Toronto's fight with Ontario has higher stakes than the mere size of a municipal council.

The city encompasses more citizens than most provinces, and its financial sector is an engine for the broader national economy.

That political battle has quickly escalated to the constitutional front.

The city's request has raised the question of who will ultimately wield authority over the proposal to reshape city council: the province, the courts, or even the federal government.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, speaking in Saskatchewan as the Toronto meeting took place, stressed he would not change his position on the Ford government's decision to invoke the notwithstanding clause.

"I'm disappointed that the provincial government chose to take this decision to override people's rights and freedoms but at the same time, I'm not going to weigh in on the actual debate over the size of the municipal governments in Ontario, in Toronto," he said. "I don't think that's a role that the federal government needs to take on."

City Councillor Joe Mihevc said he hoped that the Trudeau government's many Toronto Liberal MPs could be persuaded to support overriding Mr. Ford: "I would say, at this time, Mr. Prime Minister, Toronto needs you ... We need you to enforce that principle in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms that we are all created equal under the law."

The battle over Mr. Ford's plan has left city officials reeling as they try to prepare ballots, voting cards and polling stations for the Oct. 22 vote, which remains surrounded with confusion.

City clerk Ulli Watkiss told councillors on Thursday that all the uncertainty over the legislation has her at a "tipping point" on her ability to properly administer the vote, however many wards the city ends up with. She told council she has retained her own lawyer to seek advice on, among other questions, whether her powers to run the election include the ability to postpone it.

"I am frankly at that point. ... Every hour that goes by, every day that goes by, creates greater uncertainty and raises in me a huge concern over the proper conduct of this election," Ms. Watkiss said. "I have to let council know that."

The opposition parties in the Ontario Legislature have vowed to use procedural tools to delay the province's bill as much as possible.

The NDP said Thursday that it will challenge the bill under rules that prevent legislators from introducing substantially the same bill twice in one session, and that bar the legislature from debating an item currently before the courts.

The legislature's Speaker, Progressive Conservative Ted Arnott, will be called to rule on the matter, though it's unclear how long it will take him to decide.

The Ford government, meanwhile, is seeking to make procedural changes that the NDP says aims to prevent opposition parties from delaying the passing of legislation.

NDP Leader Andrea Horwath noted that several provincial and federal Conservatives have spoken out against the notwithstanding clause.

"The only Conservatives defending the Premier's decision are the ones who rely on him for their jobs," she said. "How can the Premier be so certain that he is right when so many thoughtful Conservatives are telling him he is utterly and totally wrong?" On Monday, an Ontario Superior Court judge ruled that Mr. Ford's first legislation aimed at cutting Toronto's council, passed Aug. 14 with the municipal election well under way, violated the Charter's freedomof-expression clause. The Premier responded hours later by announcing that he would invoke the Charter's Section 33, the notwithstanding clause, for the first time in Ontario's history. His new bill to cut council, introduced Wednesday, sparked protests inside and outside the legislature.

The original court battle against Mr.

Ford's first attempt at the legislation is set to go before the Ontario Court of Appeal on Tuesday. The Ontario government is seeking a stay of the lower-court ruling, pending the result of its appeal. If successful, Monday's judicial order that reverted the city to a 47-ward election would be put on hold.

Many city councillors acknowledge their hopes of a court win were faint ones. The vote to fight on comes despite warnings in a two-page confidential legal briefing distributed to councillors and seen by The Globe and Mail that concludes the city has very "limited options" and that any legal challenge will be "very difficult."

Councillors also voted to launch a separate constitutional challenge of Mr. Ford's use of the notwithstanding clause. But such a challenge, making use of previous rulings that the clause cannot be used retroactively, may be difficult, the legal briefing reads, as the facts in the current case are "significantly different."

In her confidential report, city solicitor Wendy Walberg is also skeptical of asking Ottawa to intervene and use its littleknown power of "disallowance," saying she has "no reason to believe" the federal government would dust off this section of the Constitution: "The powers ... have not been used in many decades."

City Councillor Paula Fletcher called Mr.

Ford's suspension of the Charter, and his threat to do it again for other pieces of legislation, "chilling for democracy" and reminiscent of politics south of the border: "Many people have said to me on the doorstep, it's very Trump-like. And that is what concerns me."

A number of mostly suburban and rightleaning councillors support Mr. Ford's move. City Councillor Stephen Holyday, from Mr. Ford's political home base in the west-end suburb of Etobicoke, said he feared the legal battle will only hamper the clerk's efforts to run the election: "The horse left the barn a long time ago when it was announced there would be a downsizing of council."

Don Iveson, the mayor of Edmonton and the chairman of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities Big City Mayors' Caucus, issued a statement supporting Toronto's "efforts to protect local democracy" and calling for provincial and federal governments to work more closely with cities.

With a report from The Canadian Press

Associated Graphic

City clerk Ulli Watkiss answers questions at Toronto City Hall on Thursday.


Huh? How did I get here?
Return to Main Paul_Knox Page
Subscribe to
The Globe and Mail

Email this article Print this article

space  Advertisement

Need CPR for your RSP? Check your portfolio’s pulse and lower yours by improving the overall health of your investments. Click here.


7-Day Site Search

Breaking News

Today's Weather


Rick Salutin
Merrily marching
off to war
Roy MacGregor
Duct tape might hold
when panic strikes

Where Manley is going with his first budget



For a columnist's most recent stories, click on their name below.


Roy MacGregor arrow
This Country
Jeffrey Simpson arrow
The Nation
Margaret Wente arrow
Hugh Winsor  arrow
The Power Game

Rob Carrick arrow
Personal Finance
Drew Fagan arrow
The Big Picture
Mathew Ingram arrow
Brent Jang arrow
Business West
Brian Milner arrow
Taking Stock
Eric Reguly arrow
To The Point
Andrew Willis arrow

Stephen Brunt arrow
The Game
Eric Duhatschek arrow
Allan Maki arrow
William Houston arrow
Truth & Rumours
Lorne Rubenstein arrow
 The Arts

John Doyle arrow
John MacLachlan Gray arrow
Gray's Anatomy
David Macfarlane arrow
Cheap Seats
Johanna Schneller arrow

Murray Campbell arrow
Ontario Politics
Lysiane Gagnon arrow
Inside Quebec
Marcus Gee arrow
The World
William Johnson arrow
Pit Bill
Paul Knox arrow
Heather Mallick arrow
As If
Leah McLaren arrow
Generation Why
Rex Murphy arrow
Japes of Wrath
Rick Salutin arrow
On The Other Hand
Paul Sullivan arrow
The West
William Thorsell arrow

Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels

© 2003 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Help & Contact Us | Back to the top of this page