stats
globeinteractive.com: Making the Business of Life Easier

   Finance globeinvestor   Careers globecareers.workopolis Subscribe to The Globe
The Globe and Mail /globeandmail.com
Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels
space


Search

space
  This site         Tips

  
space
  The Web Google
space
   space



space

  Where to Find It


Breaking News
  Home Page

  Report on Business

  Sports

  Technology

space
Subscribe to The Globe

Shop at our Globe Store


Print Edition
  Front Page

  Report on Business

  National

  International

  Sports

  Arts & Entertainment

  Editorials

  Columnists

   Headline Index

 Other Sections
  Appointments

  Births & Deaths

  Books

  Classifieds

  Comment

  Education

  Environment

  Facts & Arguments

  Focus

  Health

  Obituaries

  Real Estate

  Review

  Science

  Style

  Technology

  Travel

  Wheels

 Leisure
  Cartoon

  Crosswords

  Food & Dining

  Golf

  Horoscopes

  Movies

  Online Personals

  TV Listings/News

 Specials & Series
  All Reports...

space

Services
   Where to Find It
 A quick guide to what's available on the site

 Newspaper
  Advertise

  Corrections

  Customer Service

  Help & Contact Us

  Reprints

  Subscriptions

 Web Site
  Advertise

  E-Mail Newsletters

  Free Headlines

  Globe Store New

  Help & Contact Us

  Make Us Home

  Mobile New

  Press Room

  Privacy Policy

  Terms & Conditions


GiveLife.ca

    

PRINT EDITION
Why Canada cares about that Security Council seat
space
Earning a place at the UN's most important table would give Ottawa an unmatched opportunity to elevate the country's concerns internationally
space
By ROLAND PARIS
  
  

Email this article Print this article
Saturday, December 1, 2018 – Page O4

Professor of international affairs at the University of Ottawa, associate fellow at Chatham House and former foreign-policy adviser to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau C anada will stand for election to the United Nations Security Council in June, 2020. Our competitors are Norway and Ireland. Of the three countries, two will win seats on the council and begin their twoyear terms in January, 2021.

There is no guarantee of victory for Canada, but it is still worth the effort. As international tensions mount and the United States retreats from global leadership, Canada and like-minded countries must do what they can to sustain co-operation and the wobbling structures of a rulesbased international system. This task extends far beyond the United Nations, but the world body remains the flagship of the multilateral system.

At the core of the UN is the Security Council, still the most important table in international politics. Its 15 members, including five permanent ones - the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France - and 10 that hold rotating seats, grapple with the world's most pressing security problems. With geopolitical rivalry on the rise, however, they are increasingly grappling with each other.

The last time Canada served on the council, in 1999-2000, it led a successful campaign to establish civilian protection as a centrepiece of the UN's activities and to control the trade in "conflict diamonds," which were fuelling African wars. Behind the scenes, Canada helped develop new, more effective working methods in the council.

The challenges facing the UN today are greater than they were two decades ago. Russia's veto has paralyzed the Security Council's response to both the crisis in Ukraine and the war in Syria, the worst catastrophe of the young 21st century. The council has little to say about the Iranian nuclear agreement now that the United States has renounced the pact. Nor is it doing much about the dangerous sovereignty disputes in the South China Sea thanks to China's veto.

Given this lamentable state of affairs, why should Canada even bother seeking a seat?

First, Canada can make progress in areas where the Security Council is still able to act. Most of the world's conflicts, and almost a third of its displaced people, are in Africa. Canada could champion efforts to strengthen the UN's conflict-prevention tools, a long-standing goal for the organization. It could lead an international campaign to provide 100 per cent of refugee children and youth with quality primary education, providing them with skills and hope for the future and reducing their susceptibility to radicalization. It could strengthen the patchwork system for training peacekeeping troops, while also asking difficult, but necessary, questions about which UN peace operations should be shut down.

Second, Canada can insert its own issues onto the Security Council's agenda. The government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has emphasized the empowerment of women and children, along with combating the effects of climate change and improving the health of oceans. All of these issues have security dimensions falling under the Security Council's mandate. If a different Canadian government comes to power after next year's federal election, it can promote its own set of priorities. Either way, a seat on the council offers an unmatched opportunity to elevate Canada's concerns.

Third, serving on the council would strengthen Canada's ability to assemble coalitions of likeminded states in order to address pressing problems outside the framework of the United Nations. Canada has a recognized capacity to convene and mobilize groups on specific international issues. We are helped in this regard by being close to the United States without being the United States, by having a reputation for effective consensusbuilding and by being members of some of the world's most important groupings, including the Group of Seven, the Group of 20, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization - and, hopefully, the Security Council.

The value of these memberships is often underestimated as a means of achieving Canadian goals.

Consider, for example, Ottawa's recent efforts to sustain the international trade regime. The World Trade Organization is at the centre of a growing battle between the United States and China. The United States argues, with good reason, that certain Chinese practices - such as forcing technology transfers from foreign companies and subsidizing politically directed, stateowned enterprises - violate the spirit, if not the letter, of WTO rules on free and open trade.

Washington's response, however, has included blocking appointments to the WTO's rule-enforcing body, thus putting the entire multilateral trading system at risk.

Canada, an advanced but relatively small economy that depends on open international trade, has a clear interest in the system's survival. It therefore made perfect sense for the federal government to convene a meeting of trade ministers from 13 like-minded partners last month - including the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Australia and Chile - to begin exploring possible fixes. I met one of the visiting ministers the day after the meeting. He said Canada was a natural host for such a gathering, in part because we are members of both the G7 and the G20.

The ministerial group hopes to bring more countries into the process over time. The United States and China have been kept informed of these discussions and are watching with interest.

Achieving universal agreement on reforming the WTO will be nigh impossible, but finding practical measures that can at least forestall the organization's collapse may be achievable. A subset of WTO members could agree, for example, to additional standards on the financing of state-owned enterprises, then encourage other countries to sign on.

Practical problem-solving of this kind, including the reform of outmoded international institutions, is a fitting role for Canada and an increasingly necessary one, given the erosion of so many rules and norms. It is also a role that Canadians expect their country to play. In poll after poll, they express a desire for Canada to make a constructive contribution in world affairs - the furthest thing from isolationism.

Public support for the United Nations, in particular, is consistently strong. In a survey earlier this year, 88 per cent of Canadians indicated that supporting the UN was "important," with 57 per cent calling it "critically important."

In 2016, more than three-quarters of Canadians said that seeking a Security Council seat should be a "priority" for Canada.

Some of this sentiment may be rooted in nostalgia or an exaggerated belief in Canada's importance. In truth, we can shape international events only at the margins. However, those who dismiss the multilateralist inclinations of Canadians as naive "do-goodism" overlook the connection between these sentiments and our core foreign-policy interests. Canada is not strong enough to flourish in a world where powerful states abandon multilateral rules and replace them with unilateral threats. The multilateralist impulses of Canadians, in other words, make good strategic sense.

The challenge now is to channel these impulses into a more focused set of initiatives aimed at shoring up key institutions. It will require creative diplomacy - including with non-traditional partners and non-governmental actors - along with a guiding plan and the sustained attention of our political leaders.

A seat on the Security Council would help Canada pursue these goals. It is not the only means of doing so, but as a platform for international action, nothing beats it.

Associated Graphic

Members of the United Nations Security Council gather at a meeting on Monday. Canada last served on the council from 1999-2000.

SETH WENIG/ASSOCIATED PRESS


Huh? How did I get here?
Return to Main Rex_Murphy Page
Subscribe to
The Globe and Mail
 

Email this article Print this article

space  Advertisement
space

Need CPR for your RSP? Check your portfolio’s pulse and lower yours by improving the overall health of your investments. Click here.

Advertisement

7-Day Site Search
    

Breaking News



Today's Weather


Inside

Rick Salutin
Merrily marching
off to war
Roy MacGregor
Duct tape might hold
when panic strikes


Editorial
Where Manley is going with his first budget




space

Columnists



For a columnist's most recent stories, click on their name below.

 National


Roy MacGregor arrow
This Country
space
Jeffrey Simpson arrow
The Nation
space
Margaret Wente arrow
Counterpoint
space
Hugh Winsor  arrow
The Power Game
space
 Business


Rob Carrick arrow
Personal Finance
space
Drew Fagan arrow
The Big Picture
space
Mathew Ingram arrow
space
Brent Jang arrow
Business West
space
Brian Milner arrow
Taking Stock
space
Eric Reguly arrow
To The Point
space
Andrew Willis arrow
Streetwise
space
 Sports


Stephen Brunt arrow
The Game
space
Eric Duhatschek arrow
space
Allan Maki arrow
space
William Houston arrow
Truth & Rumours
space
Lorne Rubenstein arrow
Golf
space
 The Arts


John Doyle arrow
Television
space
John MacLachlan Gray arrow
Gray's Anatomy
space
David Macfarlane arrow
Cheap Seats
space
Johanna Schneller arrow
Moviegoer
space
 Comment


Murray Campbell arrow
Ontario Politics
space
Lysiane Gagnon arrow
Inside Quebec
space
Marcus Gee arrow
The World
space
William Johnson arrow
Pit Bill
space
Paul Knox arrow
Worldbeat
space
Heather Mallick arrow
As If
space
Leah McLaren arrow
Generation Why
space
Rex Murphy arrow
Japes of Wrath
space
Rick Salutin arrow
On The Other Hand
space
Paul Sullivan arrow
The West
space
William Thorsell arrow
space





Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels
space

© 2003 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Help & Contact Us | Back to the top of this page