stats Making the Business of Life Easier

   Finance globeinvestor   Careers globecareers.workopolis Subscribe to The Globe
The Globe and Mail /
Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels


  This site         Tips

  The Web Google


  Where to Find It

Breaking News
  Home Page

  Report on Business



Subscribe to The Globe

Shop at our Globe Store

Print Edition
  Front Page

  Report on Business




  Arts & Entertainment



   Headline Index

 Other Sections

  Births & Deaths






  Facts & Arguments




  Real Estate









  Food & Dining




  Online Personals

  TV Listings/News

 Specials & Series
  All Reports...


   Where to Find It
 A quick guide to what's available on the site



  Customer Service

  Help & Contact Us



 Web Site

  E-Mail Newsletters

  Free Headlines

  Globe Store New

  Help & Contact Us

  Make Us Home

  Mobile New

  Press Room

  Privacy Policy

  Terms & Conditions


The ecosystem of women's soccer is still fragile and respect would help
FIFA offers little more than grudging tolerance, as if it were making a charitable donation

Email this article Print this article
Saturday, June 8, 2019 – Page S3

TORONTO -- The first Women's World Cup, then called the FIFA Women's World Championship, was held in China in 1991.

Twelve countries competed and the United States won it.

The U.S. magazine Sports Illustrated devoted a story to the victory that was less than one page in length. That two-thirds-of-apage piece appeared in print opposite a stunningly sexist fullpage ad. Two attractive women on a ski lift gaze out and the caption is, "I just saw what I want for Christmas, and I bet he drinks Johnnie Walker Red."

This fact is no buried secret. It was pointed out recently on social media by Sports Illustrated's main soccer writer. His intention was to contrast 1991 with now, when the entire U.S. women's team is on the cover of the magazine and there are seven different versions available.

It would be easy to conclude that much has changed since 1991 and that there are so many reasons to be happy about the raised profile and coverage of the women's game. But it would be wrong.

The women's game has grown in stature, evolved; and magazine covers every few years mean something, but the ecosystem of women's soccer is fragile, not robust. As this FIFA Women's World Cup unfolds in France, there is still something lacking. Mainly, it's respect.

First, respect from FIFA and the regional governing bodies of soccer. This World Cup is already tainted by a major screw-up in FIFA's ticketing operation. Many fans attending the tournament printed their tickets in May only to find seats that were bought together were not placed together.

Families were separated by rows of seats. Even some couples who bought a pair of tickets together found they were being seated separately in FIFA's system. FIFA's first response was to blame the purchasers for not reading the fine print. The response from some was "What fine print?" It was a fiasco that never happens at a men's World Cup or the men's UEFA tournaments. It screamed lack of respect for supporters of the women's game.

And there's another issue: It is frankly appalling that this Women's World Cup is obliged to compete for attention with two overlapping tournaments in the men's game. While the women's teams from 24 countries are competing in France, both the Gold Cup and the Copa America will be played. That means men's teams from North and Central America and the Caribbean are playing for the Gold Cup while most of soccer-obsessed South America will be galvanized by the Copa, one of the fiercely fought regional competitions and this year held in Brazil.

The timing of the Copa is especially provocative because women's teams from Argentina, Brazil and Chile are competing in France. Brazil's women's team is running on fumes. The infrastructure supporting the women's game there is a shambles and the team has lost nine recent games.

Argentina's team, before qualifying for France, had a two-year period with no games and no coach.

Chile's team was also inactive for more than two years and only when the players themselves took charge did the situation change.

Neglect of the women's game is rampant in South America.

Asking the women's teams to compete for attention with the men's team while a continent is at fever-pitch about the Copa is another insult. FIFA might see some logic to the final match in all three competitions being played on the same day, July 7, but it's unlikely that a single woman playing the game would view it that way.

What women's soccer gets from FIFA is a kind of grudging tolerance, as though FIFA were making a charitable donation and expects praise for its efforts.

At least one issue that clouded the previous Women's World Cup, in Canada, does not overshadow the tournament in France - the matter of women playing on artificial turf. But money is a major irritant, as it was in 2015. Consider this: The French men's team got US$38million for winning the World Cup in Russia last year, and the U.S. women got US$2-million for winning the World Cup in Canada in 2015. The team winning the final in France will get US$4-million.

Doubling the amount seems like largesse, but the big picture presents even more glaring disparities. The pool of prize money for the 32 teams at the men's World Cup in 2018 was US$400million. This Women's World Cup 2019 prize-money pool is US$30million. It is estimated FIFA's profit between 2015 and 2018 was US$1.2-billion. Further, it's estimated that FIFA is sitting on a US$2.75-billion reserve bank account.

The U.S. women's team has filed a gender-discrimination lawsuit against its own soccer federation, on the issue of money. Professional Footballers Australia has asked FIFA to pay more money to women at this World Cup and it began a social-media campaign to raise awareness of the issue.

It's the pettiness of FIFA's treatment of the women's game that is inescapably insulting. For this Women's World Cup, most but not all teams will be flown business class to France. Depends on the length of the flight. For the first time, teams will not be obliged to share hotels with teams they compete against, but for some players, their soccer federations decline to pay for such things as WiFi at a hotel.

Two years ago, the women's team representing the Republic of Ireland, then in contention for a spot at this World Cup, threatened strike action. Among the issues the women raised was having to go into public washrooms in airports to change into, and then out of, tracksuits for international games, as the tracksuits had to be used again by other Irish teams. Also, they were paid nothing for appearances for their country. Nothing. They asked for 300 (about $450). In that instance, FIFA declined to recognize the legitimacy of the women's players' organization in negotiations with Ireland's soccer authorities. That changed, but only after the women went public with their story and threatened strike action. They were led in their protest by Stephanie Roche, the player who was the runnerup for the 2014 FIFA Puskas Award for the best goal of the year.

The cover of Sports Illustrated and huge Nike billboards will help send the U.S. team to France with oomph and pizzazz. No player will lack for money or facilities. The same applies to Canada's women's team. The women's game is thriving in France, week to week, year to year. It is thriving in England and other countries, too. But, in women's soccer, the high-profile teams and players are anomalies. The international ecosystem is incredibly fragile.

Outside the United States and Canada, and a handful of other countries, not that much has changed since 1991.

Associated Graphic

The FIFA Women's World Cup kicked off in Paris on Friday, with the host French team giving its guests from South Korea a 4-0 drubbing. The premier women's event will have to compete for global soccer attention with two major men's tournaments.


Huh? How did I get here?
Return to Main Johanna_Schneller Page
Subscribe to
The Globe and Mail

Email this article Print this article

space  Advertisement

Need CPR for your RSP? Check your portfolio’s pulse and lower yours by improving the overall health of your investments. Click here.


7-Day Site Search

Breaking News

Today's Weather


Rick Salutin
Merrily marching
off to war
Roy MacGregor
Duct tape might hold
when panic strikes

Where Manley is going with his first budget



For a columnist's most recent stories, click on their name below.


Roy MacGregor arrow
This Country
Jeffrey Simpson arrow
The Nation
Margaret Wente arrow
Hugh Winsor  arrow
The Power Game

Rob Carrick arrow
Personal Finance
Drew Fagan arrow
The Big Picture
Mathew Ingram arrow
Brent Jang arrow
Business West
Brian Milner arrow
Taking Stock
Eric Reguly arrow
To The Point
Andrew Willis arrow

Stephen Brunt arrow
The Game
Eric Duhatschek arrow
Allan Maki arrow
William Houston arrow
Truth & Rumours
Lorne Rubenstein arrow
 The Arts

John Doyle arrow
John MacLachlan Gray arrow
Gray's Anatomy
David Macfarlane arrow
Cheap Seats
Johanna Schneller arrow

Murray Campbell arrow
Ontario Politics
Lysiane Gagnon arrow
Inside Quebec
Marcus Gee arrow
The World
William Johnson arrow
Pit Bill
Paul Knox arrow
Heather Mallick arrow
As If
Leah McLaren arrow
Generation Why
Rex Murphy arrow
Japes of Wrath
Rick Salutin arrow
On The Other Hand
Paul Sullivan arrow
The West
William Thorsell arrow

Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels

© 2003 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Help & Contact Us | Back to the top of this page