stats Making the Business of Life Easier

   Finance globeinvestor   Careers globecareers.workopolis Subscribe to The Globe
The Globe and Mail /
Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels


  This site         Tips

  The Web Google


  Where to Find It

Breaking News
  Home Page

  Report on Business



Subscribe to The Globe

Shop at our Globe Store

Print Edition
  Front Page

  Report on Business




  Arts & Entertainment



   Headline Index

 Other Sections

  Births & Deaths






  Facts & Arguments




  Real Estate









  Food & Dining




  Online Personals

  TV Listings/News

 Specials & Series
  All Reports...


   Where to Find It
 A quick guide to what's available on the site



  Customer Service

  Help & Contact Us



 Web Site

  E-Mail Newsletters

  Free Headlines

  Globe Store New

  Help & Contact Us

  Make Us Home

  Mobile New

  Press Room

  Privacy Policy

  Terms & Conditions


The Death of Stalin is a darkly hilarious satire
Veep mastermind Armando Iannucci takes the Kremlin apart from the inside out

Email this article Print this article
Friday, March 16, 2018 – Page A16

The British director Arman do Iannucci, known to audiences as the creator of the HBO comedy series Veep, has now turned his attention to Russian politics: The Death of Stalin is a satirical drama set in the Soviet Union in 1953. After the brutal dictator collapses from a stroke, the clownish Nikita Khrushchev competes for power with the vicious secret-police boss Lavrentiy Beria.

This is an unusual project: Whose idea was it to turn a French graphic novel about a Russian dictator into an English-language film?

Round about 2014, I was making the fourth season of Veepand I knew it was going to be my last: I was thinking about the next thing, about doing something about a fictional dictator, contemporary. Because something strange was happening in democracies, people were coming into power and then changing constitutions so they could stay in power. Quite by chance I got sent by the French producers, Quad, this graphic novel, The Death of Stalin. It was funny but horrifying, absurd and terrifying, all the things I was thinking about, yet it was all true. Why bother with a fictional dictator when this is the real thing? I immediately got on the phone and said, "Let's do it."

How did the script get worked up?

I followed as much as possible the structure [of the novel], but in a comic book the dialogue isn't as plentiful. I thought, "I want a great actor to play each character so they have to have really good lines to say." It's as simple as that, really, and then folding in some of the other themes I wanted, the power play, the struggle between Khrushchev and Beria, and the other form of madness, in Stalin's children.

It's a slow process. We spent about a year and a half fleshing it out, folding in as much accurate detail as possible, going to Moscow, visiting Stalin's dacha, visiting his bunker, the Kremlin, talking to people who grew up in that era, what was it like going through the night not knowing whether you were going to make it to the morning.

When it came to casting, did you have particular actors in mind?

I knew I wanted Simon Russell Beale as Beria. Simon is a very well-known stage actor in the U.K. but he hasn't done anything else. I have seen him do Othello, and King Lear. He's powerful, yet funny; he is charismatic. I wanted someone playing Beria who people wouldn't recognize: We don't have an image of Beria. So I liked the idea of Simon being a relative unknown, despite his age and experience.

And for Khrushchev I wanted someone big and loud and energetic, someone who could play the clown yet could suddenly become the next dictator, and be frightening. So I thought of Steve [Buscemi]. He's got that ability to be funny and chilling at the same time.

I've often observed that satire is hard to sustain because the audience doesn't relate to farcical characters as closely as ones in in drama. How you do hold their interest?

I don't really see it as satire; it's just a story. Once you actually get into the rehearsal and the filming, you concentrate on trying to make these people as three-dimensional and believable as possible. I didn't want everyone to say: "Okay, Beria is the baddie; Khrushchev is the goodie." I wanted it to get complicated. The more you get to know the people, the more your response to them starts to change.

And I keep people back to give fresh bursts of energy: [Field Marshall] Zhukov only comes in halfway but he comes in all guns blazing; similarly, we introduce Stalin's children a bit further on.

I like to get some plates spinning, and then add a few more, and add a few more.

That's a great metaphor for entertainment. How did you resolve the moral issue underlying the film? Stalin killed millions and here we are laughing uproariously.

I said when we started filming we have to be very respectful to what happened to the people; that is not played for laughs; that is played for real. The laughter is the people inside the Kremlin, their crazy behaviour. I knew I was going to have to balance this farce and high tragedy and one would feed off the other. It was about being really careful not to put the laughs on what was happening, but to laugh at the perpetrators. And this is borne out by the reaction of audiences in Russia who stood and applauded at the end.

It has been well received in Russia?

Well received until they banned it. It was given a licence, it was dubbed; we did the press screenings and then, two days beforehand, somebody in ministry of culture removed the licence. I think they got nervous because there is a presidential election coming up. One cinema kept showing it and people stood and applauded. The older generation, they have many memories of what it was like; that generation said two things: it was funny and it was true.

How strong did you want contemporary resonances to be?

I thought the contemporary resonance would come if we got the history right, rather than trying to turn it into an abstract thing because then you lose the nuance of the characters. They all speak in [different] English accents rather than Russian accents because I wanted it to feel here and now rather than in some land far, far away. (In the Soviet Union at the time there were so many accents and dialects. Stalin spoke Georgian; Khrushchev was from Ukraine. It wasn't like there was a single Russian accent.)

We shot it in the summer of 2016, the American election hadn't happened. But there were these odd parallels. The whole stuff about alternative facts was like Beria; he says, "We are in a new reality." He says "False narrative," which is like fake news.

I find the contemporary resonances chilling in a way. This could be happening now if we don't protect our freedom of speech; if we don't allow opposition to thrive. I showed it at Sundance and afterwards someone came up to me from the audience. She was crying and she said: "This is my country." She was from Zimbabwe. [Robert] Mugabe had just left the presidency after 30 years.

This interview has been condensed and edited The Death of Stalin opens March 16



Directed by Armando Iannucci Written by Armando Iannucci, David Schneider, Ian Martin and Peter Fellows Starring Steve Buscemi and Simon Russell Beale 4

Armando Iannucci, known to North American audiences via Veep but also as the co-creator of Steve Coogan's Alan Partridge character on British TV, does a delightful takedown of absolutist regimes in this black comedy about Stalin's toadies jockeying for power after the big man is felled by a stroke.

Most of us will know that Nikita Khrushchev (a clowning wise guy courtesy of Steve Buscemi) will somehow win his battle for power against the secret-police boss Lavrentiy Beria (Simon Russell Beale creates a depraved bully). But getting there is suspenseful enough to make this the rare satire that never wears out its welcome, as the Keystone Cops try to find the ailing Stalin a doctor - Beria's thugs have killed all the good ones - and then plan his state funeral.

There is one thing that power can't stand, and that is to be mocked: The social importance of this topical romp should not be underestimated.

Associated Graphic

Jason Isaacs stars in The Death of Stalin, a film whose social importance should not be underestimated.

Huh? How did I get here?
Return to Main John_MacLachlan_Gray Page
Subscribe to
The Globe and Mail

Email this article Print this article

space  Advertisement

Need CPR for your RSP? Check your portfolio’s pulse and lower yours by improving the overall health of your investments. Click here.


7-Day Site Search

Breaking News

Today's Weather


Rick Salutin
Merrily marching
off to war
Roy MacGregor
Duct tape might hold
when panic strikes

Where Manley is going with his first budget



For a columnist's most recent stories, click on their name below.


Roy MacGregor arrow
This Country
Jeffrey Simpson arrow
The Nation
Margaret Wente arrow
Hugh Winsor  arrow
The Power Game

Rob Carrick arrow
Personal Finance
Drew Fagan arrow
The Big Picture
Mathew Ingram arrow
Brent Jang arrow
Business West
Brian Milner arrow
Taking Stock
Eric Reguly arrow
To The Point
Andrew Willis arrow

Stephen Brunt arrow
The Game
Eric Duhatschek arrow
Allan Maki arrow
William Houston arrow
Truth & Rumours
Lorne Rubenstein arrow
 The Arts

John Doyle arrow
John MacLachlan Gray arrow
Gray's Anatomy
David Macfarlane arrow
Cheap Seats
Johanna Schneller arrow

Murray Campbell arrow
Ontario Politics
Lysiane Gagnon arrow
Inside Quebec
Marcus Gee arrow
The World
William Johnson arrow
Pit Bill
Paul Knox arrow
Heather Mallick arrow
As If
Leah McLaren arrow
Generation Why
Rex Murphy arrow
Japes of Wrath
Rick Salutin arrow
On The Other Hand
Paul Sullivan arrow
The West
William Thorsell arrow

Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels

© 2003 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Help & Contact Us | Back to the top of this page