stats
globeinteractive.com: Making the Business of Life Easier

   Finance globeinvestor   Careers globecareers.workopolis Subscribe to The Globe
The Globe and Mail /globeandmail.com
Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels
space


Search

space
  This site         Tips

  
space
  The Web Google
space
   space



space

  Where to Find It


Breaking News
  Home Page

  Report on Business

  Sports

  Technology

space
Subscribe to The Globe

Shop at our Globe Store


Print Edition
  Front Page

  Report on Business

  National

  International

  Sports

  Arts & Entertainment

  Editorials

  Columnists

   Headline Index

 Other Sections
  Appointments

  Births & Deaths

  Books

  Classifieds

  Comment

  Education

  Environment

  Facts & Arguments

  Focus

  Health

  Obituaries

  Real Estate

  Review

  Science

  Style

  Technology

  Travel

  Wheels

 Leisure
  Cartoon

  Crosswords

  Food & Dining

  Golf

  Horoscopes

  Movies

  Online Personals

  TV Listings/News

 Specials & Series
  All Reports...

space

Services
   Where to Find It
 A quick guide to what's available on the site

 Newspaper
  Advertise

  Corrections

  Customer Service

  Help & Contact Us

  Reprints

  Subscriptions

 Web Site
  Advertise

  E-Mail Newsletters

  Free Headlines

  Globe Store New

  Help & Contact Us

  Make Us Home

  Mobile New

  Press Room

  Privacy Policy

  Terms & Conditions


GiveLife.ca

    

PRINT EDITION
Political rhetoric clouds how carbon pricing could work
space
space
By KONRAD YAKABUSKI
  
  

Email this article Print this article
Wednesday, July 11, 2018 – Page B1

Now that Ontario's new Progressive Conservative government has officially ended the Liberals' cap-and-trade experiment, Canada's most populous province has no plan to reduce carbon emissions. And if you believe Premier Doug Ford, it doesn't matter.

"Cap-and-trade and carbon-tax schemes are no more than government cash grabs that do nothing for the environment, while hitting people in the wallet in order to fund big government programs," Mr. Ford insisted last week in announcing an end to the province's 18-month-old cap-and-trade regime.

Sadly, he has a point. Almost everywhere carbon pricing has been implemented, it has failed to put a meaningful dent in greenhouse gas emissions.

But that's because the politicians who have embraced either cap-and-trade or carbon taxes have been reluctant to make the hard choices needed to meet their own stated carbon-reduction goals.

In other words, they've been faking it.

"The result is a policy prescription widely billed as a panacea is acting as a narcotic," Jeffrey Ball of Stanford University's Steyer-Taylor Center for Energy Policy and Finance writes in a recent Foreign Affairs article. "It's giving politicians and the public the warm feeling that they're fighting climate change even as the problem continues to grow."

An effective carbon-reduction scheme would involve not only putting a price on carbon far higher than any government has contemplated. It would require massive investments in carbon capture, energy storage, small modular nuclear reactors or other low-carbon technologies still in their infancy due to a lack of funding or incentives.

As it is, existing carbon-pricing schemes are mostly feel-good policies that may do more harm than good by lulling voters into complacency. They won't get us to anywhere close to where we need to go anywhere fast enough.

With Ontario and Saskatchewan now challenging Ottawa's authority to impose a carbon tax on provinces without their own carbon-pricing scheme, Canadians are witnessing a phony war that is detracting attention from the real problem.

That problem consists of designing a carbon-reduction plan that meaningfully cuts emissions without pushing the economy over the brink. Canada is hardly alone in this challenge.

"Physics, politics and economics all conspire to make climate change what social scientists call a 'wicked problem' - one in which every supposed solution creates another complication," notes Mr.

Ball, a former Wall Street Journal environment editor. That makes it tempting to throw one's hands up in the air, as Mr. Ford and Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe seem to have done, and leave the problem to another country, or another generation, to solve.

After all, nothing Canada does will matter if China, India and other developing countries don't act soon to curb their emissions.

Mr. Ball notes that, while China has vowed to introduce a countrywide carbon-pricing scheme within the next two years, its proposals have been steadily watered down. Current pilot projects in China put a price on carbon that is "too low to meaningfully change the behaviour of companies or citizens." So maybe carbon pricing is a dead end. Perhaps a new approach is needed.

One promising development arose earlier this year from the unlikeliest of sources. The budget bill that U.S. President Donald Trump signed in February provides major tax incentives to companies that capture their carbon emissions. Development of carbon capture-and-storage (CCS) technology has stalled in recent years.

But analysts expect the new incentives, which include a US$50 tax credit for each tonne of carbon stored, will spur renewed interest and investments in CCS.

Since it is illusory to expect that China, India and the developing world will wean themselves off coal in the coming decades, CCS could constitute the world's best shot at getting within shooting distance of the goals set out in the 2015 Paris climate accord.

Nuclear power production also needs to be maintained at current levels, if not increased. Safety concerns could be minimized by incentivizing the development and installation of small modular reactors.

Instead of subsidizing more wind and solar power production, developing energy storage technologies that enable the optimization of existing renewable power sources should be a priority.

And funding the development of better electric car batteries should take precedence over subsidizing electric-vehicle purchases.

And, yes Mr. Ford, gasoline taxes should rise considerably to induce consumers to buy more fuelefficient cars and drive less. Increased gas-tax proceeds should be used to provide rebates to lowincome drivers who don't pay income taxes and income tax cuts to those who do.

Until politicians who claim to want to save the planet move to implement carbon-reduction measures that actually yield results, it will be easy for their adversaries to dismiss existing carbon-pricing policies as mere "tax grabs."


Huh? How did I get here?
Return to Main Paul_Sullivan Page
Subscribe to
The Globe and Mail
 

Email this article Print this article

space  Advertisement
space

Need CPR for your RSP? Check your portfolio’s pulse and lower yours by improving the overall health of your investments. Click here.

Advertisement

7-Day Site Search
    

Breaking News



Today's Weather


Inside

Rick Salutin
Merrily marching
off to war
Roy MacGregor
Duct tape might hold
when panic strikes


Editorial
Where Manley is going with his first budget




space

Columnists



For a columnist's most recent stories, click on their name below.

 National


Roy MacGregor arrow
This Country
space
Jeffrey Simpson arrow
The Nation
space
Margaret Wente arrow
Counterpoint
space
Hugh Winsor  arrow
The Power Game
space
 Business


Rob Carrick arrow
Personal Finance
space
Drew Fagan arrow
The Big Picture
space
Mathew Ingram arrow
space
Brent Jang arrow
Business West
space
Brian Milner arrow
Taking Stock
space
Eric Reguly arrow
To The Point
space
Andrew Willis arrow
Streetwise
space
 Sports


Stephen Brunt arrow
The Game
space
Eric Duhatschek arrow
space
Allan Maki arrow
space
William Houston arrow
Truth & Rumours
space
Lorne Rubenstein arrow
Golf
space
 The Arts


John Doyle arrow
Television
space
John MacLachlan Gray arrow
Gray's Anatomy
space
David Macfarlane arrow
Cheap Seats
space
Johanna Schneller arrow
Moviegoer
space
 Comment


Murray Campbell arrow
Ontario Politics
space
Lysiane Gagnon arrow
Inside Quebec
space
Marcus Gee arrow
The World
space
William Johnson arrow
Pit Bill
space
Paul Knox arrow
Worldbeat
space
Heather Mallick arrow
As If
space
Leah McLaren arrow
Generation Why
space
Rex Murphy arrow
Japes of Wrath
space
Rick Salutin arrow
On The Other Hand
space
Paul Sullivan arrow
The West
space
William Thorsell arrow
space





Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels
space

© 2003 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Help & Contact Us | Back to the top of this page