stats
globeinteractive.com: Making the Business of Life Easier

   Finance globeinvestor   Careers globecareers.workopolis Subscribe to The Globe
The Globe and Mail /globeandmail.com
Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels
space


Search

space
  This site         Tips

  
space
  The Web Google
space
   space



space

  Where to Find It


Breaking News
  Home Page

  Report on Business

  Sports

  Technology

space
Subscribe to The Globe

Shop at our Globe Store


Print Edition
  Front Page

  Report on Business

  National

  International

  Sports

  Arts & Entertainment

  Editorials

  Columnists

   Headline Index

 Other Sections
  Appointments

  Births & Deaths

  Books

  Classifieds

  Comment

  Education

  Environment

  Facts & Arguments

  Focus

  Health

  Obituaries

  Real Estate

  Review

  Science

  Style

  Technology

  Travel

  Wheels

 Leisure
  Cartoon

  Crosswords

  Food & Dining

  Golf

  Horoscopes

  Movies

  Online Personals

  TV Listings/News

 Specials & Series
  All Reports...

space

Services
   Where to Find It
 A quick guide to what's available on the site

 Newspaper
  Advertise

  Corrections

  Customer Service

  Help & Contact Us

  Reprints

  Subscriptions

 Web Site
  Advertise

  E-Mail Newsletters

  Free Headlines

  Globe Store New

  Help & Contact Us

  Make Us Home

  Mobile New

  Press Room

  Privacy Policy

  Terms & Conditions


GiveLife.ca

    

PRINT EDITION
Curbing carbon: Big companies don't need government handouts
space
space
By BARRIE MCKENNA
  
  

Email this article Print this article
Saturday, April 13, 2019 – Page B1

Outside of rooting for the home team in a Canada-U.S. hockey match, it's hard getting Canadians to agree on much these days.

But there has been a bipartisan pile-on over Ottawa's move to give the Loblaw supermarket chain - part of the multibillion-dollar George Weston food empire - $12-million to buy new energy efficient refrigerators.

Never mind that the money represents a small outlay from Ottawa's $2-billion Low Carbon Economy Fund.

From tree huggers to climate-change deniers, the subsidy has struck a nerve on social media. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh questioned why the government would give handouts to "rich corporations" that can't seem to pay many of their employees a living wage. Conservative MP Michelle Rempel contrasted Loblaw's windfall to the plight of a small Manitoba grocery-store owner who can't afford to replace a broken fridge.

Many people pointed out that Loblaw is particularly undeserving, given its involvement in a long-running bread price-fixing scheme and last year's court finding that it owes the feds nearly $400-million in taxes from an offshore banking subsidiary.

Behind all the outrage, Canadians may be missing some important lessons about how best to curb carbon emissions.

There is nothing inherently wrong about giving money to Loblaw, whose chairman Galen Weston is among the richest Canadians.

Mr. Weston's wealth is largely irrelevant.

The problem is that it may not be the best way to encourage climate-friendly behaviour.

"Subsidies have a general problem: You may be paying a lot of money to get people to do things they would do anyway," says McGill University economist Christopher Ragan, chairman of Canada's Ecofiscal Commission.

As a result, subsidies are a very expensive way to curb greenhouse gas emissions, compared with putting a price on carbon, which the federal government is also doing.

"A higher price would encourage Loblaw to swap out its refrigerators for more efficient ones," Mr. Ragan explained. "That's how a carbon tax works. It encourages people to use energy more efficiently, no matter what."

Loblaw must replace its refrigeration equipment every few years anyway. The prospect of a lower electricity bill is a strong driver to use the most efficient technology available. And that signal grows more powerful as the price of energy rises.

The downside of any subsidy - to consumers or businesses - is that the money may be wasted. It's very difficult for governments to determine exactly how much of a financial incentive is needed to change people's behaviour.

The tipping point may be different for Loblaw than for the owner of a small grocery store.

The same flaw is inherent in other "green" subsidies, such as the large rebates offered by some provinces on luxury electric vehicles.

Most of the eligible models are beyond what average Canadians can afford. Rich Uncle Pennybags doesn't need our collective help to buy that Tesla Roadster he was going to get anyway.

The optics of giving money to large, profitable companies isn't good, but it can be a useful tool in the government's broader "carrotand-stick" plan to reduce emissions, argues Isabelle Turcotte, national policy director at the Pembina Institute. She says subsidies can also provide intangible benefits, such as creating a new market in Canada for low-emission refrigeration technology.

"Loblaw is such a powerful first purchaser," Ms. Turcotte says.

Another way to curb emissions is through regulation. But by simply capping emissions, companies may have little incentive to innovate and to do better than the rules require.

Shifting away from coal - the most carbonintensive fuel - should be the top priority. And pricing discourages consumption of the most carbon-intensive energy sources on a sliding scale - from coal to oil, and from oil to natural gas, and eventually from fossil fuels to renewables.

Ottawa, however, seems content with a scatter-gun approach to saving the planet.

"We need to take action across the board," Environment Minister Catherine McKenna insisted this week as she defended giving money to the grocery chain. "Everyone has to be reducing their emissions."

That may be true. But giving money to companies such as Loblaw could prove to be a costly - and unpopular - way to get there.

The predicament for the government is that carbon pricing, while highly effective, could prove to be even less popular.


Huh? How did I get here?
Return to Main Drew_Fagan Page
Subscribe to
The Globe and Mail
 

Email this article Print this article

space  Advertisement
space

Need CPR for your RSP? Check your portfolio’s pulse and lower yours by improving the overall health of your investments. Click here.

Advertisement

7-Day Site Search
    

Breaking News



Today's Weather


Inside

Rick Salutin
Merrily marching
off to war
Roy MacGregor
Duct tape might hold
when panic strikes


Editorial
Where Manley is going with his first budget




space

Columnists



For a columnist's most recent stories, click on their name below.

 National


Roy MacGregor arrow
This Country
space
Jeffrey Simpson arrow
The Nation
space
Margaret Wente arrow
Counterpoint
space
Hugh Winsor  arrow
The Power Game
space
 Business


Rob Carrick arrow
Personal Finance
space
Drew Fagan arrow
The Big Picture
space
Mathew Ingram arrow
space
Brent Jang arrow
Business West
space
Brian Milner arrow
Taking Stock
space
Eric Reguly arrow
To The Point
space
Andrew Willis arrow
Streetwise
space
 Sports


Stephen Brunt arrow
The Game
space
Eric Duhatschek arrow
space
Allan Maki arrow
space
William Houston arrow
Truth & Rumours
space
Lorne Rubenstein arrow
Golf
space
 The Arts


John Doyle arrow
Television
space
John MacLachlan Gray arrow
Gray's Anatomy
space
David Macfarlane arrow
Cheap Seats
space
Johanna Schneller arrow
Moviegoer
space
 Comment


Murray Campbell arrow
Ontario Politics
space
Lysiane Gagnon arrow
Inside Quebec
space
Marcus Gee arrow
The World
space
William Johnson arrow
Pit Bill
space
Paul Knox arrow
Worldbeat
space
Heather Mallick arrow
As If
space
Leah McLaren arrow
Generation Why
space
Rex Murphy arrow
Japes of Wrath
space
Rick Salutin arrow
On The Other Hand
space
Paul Sullivan arrow
The West
space
William Thorsell arrow
space





Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels
space

© 2003 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Help & Contact Us | Back to the top of this page