stats
globeinteractive.com: Making the Business of Life Easier

   Finance globeinvestor   Careers globecareers.workopolis Subscribe to The Globe
The Globe and Mail /globeandmail.com
Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels
space


Search

space
  This site         Tips

  
space
  The Web Google
space
   space



space

  Where to Find It


Breaking News
  Home Page

  Report on Business

  Sports

  Technology

space
Subscribe to The Globe

Shop at our Globe Store


Print Edition
  Front Page

  Report on Business

  National

  International

  Sports

  Arts & Entertainment

  Editorials

  Columnists

   Headline Index

 Other Sections
  Appointments

  Births & Deaths

  Books

  Classifieds

  Comment

  Education

  Environment

  Facts & Arguments

  Focus

  Health

  Obituaries

  Real Estate

  Review

  Science

  Style

  Technology

  Travel

  Wheels

 Leisure
  Cartoon

  Crosswords

  Food & Dining

  Golf

  Horoscopes

  Movies

  Online Personals

  TV Listings/News

 Specials & Series
  All Reports...

space

Services
   Where to Find It
 A quick guide to what's available on the site

 Newspaper
  Advertise

  Corrections

  Customer Service

  Help & Contact Us

  Reprints

  Subscriptions

 Web Site
  Advertise

  E-Mail Newsletters

  Free Headlines

  Globe Store New

  Help & Contact Us

  Make Us Home

  Mobile New

  Press Room

  Privacy Policy

  Terms & Conditions


GiveLife.ca

    

PRINT EDITION
Canada's lumber challenge is a NAFTA bargaining chip
space
space
By BARRIE MCKENNA
  
  

Email this article Print this article
Monday, November 20, 2017 – Page B1

OTTAWA -- Canada has done the obvious thing by taking the softwood lumber fight to a NAFTA dispute settlement panel.

And why not? The Canadian government has gone this route twice before - in 1992 and 2001 - and won both times. Given that track record, last week's filing under Chapter 19 of the North American free-trade agreement is a no-brainer.

There is another, less obvious reason this is an astute move by the Trudeau government. Canada could have held off on a challenge as a sign of goodwill to the Trump administration. Instead, it has given itself a valuable bargaining chip in the ongoing renegotiation of NAFTA.

U.S. negotiators want Chapter 19 scrapped, arguing that it usurps the sovereignty of U.S. courts. Canada sees dispute settlement as an insurance policy against a U.S. antidumping and subsidy regime that is tilted in favour of the home team.

The softwood lumber case gives Ottawa some leverage - particularly because the odds are good that Canada would win. Assuming the United States does not abandon NAFTA, Canadian negotiators should take the position that if the United States want to talk about Chapter 19, it will first have to settle the softwood lumber dispute, permanently.

The United States cannot easily make this case disappear by walking away from NAFTA. Canada could pursue it through the World Trade Organization and the U.S. courts.

On the other hand, a U.S. pullout from NAFTA would almost certainly end Canada's Chapter 19 challenge, Toronto trade lawyer Lawrence Herman said.

"The U.S. will simply end whatever panel proceedings are under way.

Period," he said. "In practical terms, it's game over."

That is unfortunate, because the U.S. case against Canada on softwood lumber is not strong. The United States initially sought a duty of nearly 27 per cent, but that has already been scaled back to 21 per cent. A NAFTA panel could reduce those duties further, perhaps to near zero.

The United States should want to put the lumber dispute to rest, for many reasons.

The Americans have long argued that the provinces, which control access to most of Canada's forests, unfairly subsidize lumber mills by charging too little to log on Crown land. This argument has never stood up to legal challenges. And Canada's forestry practices are far more market-oriented now than they were during the last go-around, in the early 2000s.

More importantly, the North American lumber market is already showing the consequences of protectionism.

Prices are up sharply since the United States launched its latest complaint against Canadian lumber imports. In the past 12 months, the price of lumber rose about 27 per cent to $436 (U.S.) per thousand board-feet, according to the Random Lengths composite index.

The purpose of the duties is to punish Canadian producers and level the playing field. But that is not what is happening.

For the most part, the duties are just being added to the final price.

The result is that U.S. consumers - homeowners, builders and contractors - not Canadians, are paying the price.

Any good economist could have predicted this. Take a market with growing demand and tight supplies, and then throw in a severe price shock in the form of duties.

Americans use more lumber than they can produce domestically, much of it for home construction.

Canada has traditionally filled the gap, supplying about 30 per cent of the U.S. market. Last year, the United States imported $7.5-billion (Canadian) worth of lumber from Canada.

The pace of U.S. housing starts has more than doubled, to about 1.3-million a year, since the depths of the recession in 2009. Rebuilding after Hurricane Harvey and Hurricane Irma has spurred additional demand.

Meanwhile, the supply of lumber is tight because of this year's forest fires and the continuing effect of a pine beetle infestation in Western Canada.

In short, there is plenty of evidence that the tariffs are inflicting a toll on the U.S. economy.

As long as NAFTA lives, Canada should use the tools at its disposal to get what it wants.

Associated Graphic

Workers sort and move lumber at the Delta Cedar Sawmill in Delta, B.C., in January. Lumber prices are up about 27 per cent since the U.S. launched its complaint against Canadian lumber imports.

DARRYL DYCK/THE CANADIAN PRESS


Huh? How did I get here?
Return to Main Drew_Fagan Page
Subscribe to
The Globe and Mail
 

Email this article Print this article

space  Advertisement
space

Need CPR for your RSP? Check your portfolio’s pulse and lower yours by improving the overall health of your investments. Click here.

Advertisement

7-Day Site Search
    

Breaking News



Today's Weather


Inside

Rick Salutin
Merrily marching
off to war
Roy MacGregor
Duct tape might hold
when panic strikes


Editorial
Where Manley is going with his first budget




space

Columnists



For a columnist's most recent stories, click on their name below.

 National


Roy MacGregor arrow
This Country
space
Jeffrey Simpson arrow
The Nation
space
Margaret Wente arrow
Counterpoint
space
Hugh Winsor  arrow
The Power Game
space
 Business


Rob Carrick arrow
Personal Finance
space
Drew Fagan arrow
The Big Picture
space
Mathew Ingram arrow
space
Brent Jang arrow
Business West
space
Brian Milner arrow
Taking Stock
space
Eric Reguly arrow
To The Point
space
Andrew Willis arrow
Streetwise
space
 Sports


Stephen Brunt arrow
The Game
space
Eric Duhatschek arrow
space
Allan Maki arrow
space
William Houston arrow
Truth & Rumours
space
Lorne Rubenstein arrow
Golf
space
 The Arts


John Doyle arrow
Television
space
John MacLachlan Gray arrow
Gray's Anatomy
space
David Macfarlane arrow
Cheap Seats
space
Johanna Schneller arrow
Moviegoer
space
 Comment


Murray Campbell arrow
Ontario Politics
space
Lysiane Gagnon arrow
Inside Quebec
space
Marcus Gee arrow
The World
space
William Johnson arrow
Pit Bill
space
Paul Knox arrow
Worldbeat
space
Heather Mallick arrow
As If
space
Leah McLaren arrow
Generation Why
space
Rex Murphy arrow
Japes of Wrath
space
Rick Salutin arrow
On The Other Hand
space
Paul Sullivan arrow
The West
space
William Thorsell arrow
space





Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels
space

© 2003 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Help & Contact Us | Back to the top of this page