stats Making the Business of Life Easier

   Finance globeinvestor   Careers globecareers.workopolis Subscribe to The Globe
The Globe and Mail /
Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels


  This site         Tips

  The Web Google


  Where to Find It

Breaking News
  Home Page

  Report on Business



Subscribe to The Globe

Shop at our Globe Store

Print Edition
  Front Page

  Report on Business




  Arts & Entertainment



   Headline Index

 Other Sections

  Births & Deaths






  Facts & Arguments




  Real Estate









  Food & Dining




  Online Personals

  TV Listings/News

 Specials & Series
  All Reports...


   Where to Find It
 A quick guide to what's available on the site



  Customer Service

  Help & Contact Us



 Web Site

  E-Mail Newsletters

  Free Headlines

  Globe Store New

  Help & Contact Us

  Make Us Home

  Mobile New

  Press Room

  Privacy Policy

  Terms & Conditions


Koreas commit to more trust-building measures
Kim says he'll destroy nuclear facilities if U.S. takes 'corresponding measures'

Email this article Print this article
Thursday, September 20, 2018 – Page A6

BEIJING -- North Korea says it will demolish at least one additional weapons facility under the watch of international inspectors as the isolated state took a series of notable new steps toward denuclearization and normalization of relations with South Korea.

North Korean supreme leader Kim Jong-un on Wednesday agreed to move quickly toward erasing nuclear weapons from the Korean Peninsula, although he made no specific move to dismantle the atomic arsenal he has already amassed. A further offer to destroy a nuclear reactor and enrichment facility was also contingent upon North Korea first securing new U.S. concessions.

But a raft of specific commitments struck at a summit in Pyongyang with South Korean President Moon Jae-in kindled fresh hope that Mr. Kim possesses a genuine determination to chart a less hostile and perhaps nuclear-free future, even if much remains to be done. The commitments include steps to further diminish military threats on the Korean Peninsula, a pledge to jointly bid for the 2032 Summer Olympics and the promise of a near-term visit by Mr. Kim to Seoul, which would be a first for a North Korean leader.

"There is a Korean saying that you cannot have a full stomach with one spoon. But at least all sides are excited to eat the food, so to speak," said Yang Sung-chul, a former South Korean ambassador to the United States who is now a senior adviser to the Kim Dae-jung Peace Foundation.

The agreements on Wednesday mark "historic progress," he said, with "pretty unprecedented co-operation and agreement between the two sides."

The North Korean concessions seemed, at a minimum, designed to restart talks with the United States. The White House immediately responded, with U.S. President Donald Trump on Twitter cheering the "very exciting!" developments in Pyongyang.

Later, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the United States is ready for a resumption of talks between the two countries, with the goal of completing North Korea's denuclearization by January, 2021.

"On the basis of these important commitments, the United States is prepared to engage immediately in negotiations to transform U.S.-DPRK relations," Mr. Pompeo said in a statement, referring to the acronym used to describe North Korea.

Mr. Pompeo said he had invited North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong-ho to meet next week in New York, where they are both due to attend the UN gathering of world leaders.

Mr. Moon, meanwhile, said he was "overwhelmed" and that the "path to complete denuclearization will be implemented and will be realized."

Critics, however, accused North Korea of making gestures that amount to little change in its nuclear capabilities, while elevating expectations of a disarmament it has, so far, shown no sign of carrying out.

As far as demolition plans, "we have to remember that these types of steps have been taken before and neither facility is necessary for North Korea to continue its nuclear and missile programs," said Melissa Hanham, a senior research associate at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies.

"You can be simultaneously optimistic about peace building between the Koreas and pessimistic about the denuclearization of the North," James Acton, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, wrote on Twitter. "Big question, though, is whether the U.S. can tolerate the former without the latter."

Skeptics have expressed doubt Mr. Kim will ever willingly abandon a weapons program whose great development cost has won him a substantial security guarantee.

Yet, North Korea's success in building new trust, particularly with South Korea, was reflected in the number of agreements struck on Wednesday. The two leaders promised joint efforts on fighting pandemics, building North Korean infrastructure, reviving tourism and reuniting families split apart by the Korean War.

Mr. Moon said of Mr. Kim on Wednesday: "I deeply commend his courageous and brave resolve."

A military agreement signed by defence ministers of the two countries includes a series of steps to withdraw troops and landmines and to hold exercises further from the demilitarized zone - which is among the Earth's most-heavily militarized areas - while expanding air and maritime buffer zones and creating a joint committee to monitor progress.

On nuclear weapons, Mr. Kim said he would allow international inspectors to witness the permanent decommissioning of the Dongchang-ri missile engine testing facility and missile launch pad, which has been used to testfire its longest-range technologies. He also pledged to close the Yongbyon nuclear facility - the country's first major nuclear site, which has been used to provide fissile material for atomic weapons - so long as the United States takes "corresponding measures."

Although North Korea is believed to maintain facilities with similar capabilities elsewhere, "these two places are iconic and very well known around the world. By making compromises there, North Korea is providing assurances that it will change its focus from military empowerment to economic development," said Wang Sheng, a North Korea expert at Jilin University in Northeast China.

Still, he said, "North Korea as a country believes in the principle of 'action-for-action,' " Prof.

Wang said. So far, "it's not very satisfied with what has been done by the U.S. side. Now that it has abandoned major facilities, its next steps will largely depend on what the U.S. does."

A Tuesday commentary in North Korea's Workers' Party-run Rodong Sinmun newspaper faulted Washington for "demanding unilateral and gangster-like" actions and "forcing the DPRK to act without showing its movement."

The White House has said it wants to see substantial progress in North Korea before easing its "maximum pressure" campaign.

U.S. officials have also demanded a full accounting of the North Korean nuclear program, which Pyongyang did not provide. Mr.Moon expects to travel to Washington for a meeting with Mr.Trump next week.

But "if the U.S. wants to see more progress on denuclearization of the peninsula, it will need to either take the lead and sign a peace treaty or agree to the removal of at least part of sanctions now imposed against North Korea," argued Cheng Xiaohe, an international politics scholar at Renmin University in Beijing.

It may even be time to give Pyongyang some benefit of the doubt, said Christopher Green, a senior adviser at the International Crisis Group.

"I think we are at the point where 'trust but verify' is a more appropriate approach than 'assume the worst,' " he said.

Still, the flurry of trust-building amounts to an opening act.

Far more complicated issues remain, particularly those involving other parties, such as the United States.

"Moon and other pro-engagement people want to incrementally change the landscape of the peninsula so that, in the end, North Korea has more to lose than to gain by keeping its nuclear weapons," Mr. Green said. "Is that possible? Yes. Does it require removal of the U.S. nuclear umbrella? Not necessarily. Is it going to be easy? Certainly not!"

With reports from Alexandra Li and Reuters

Associated Graphic

South Korean President Moon Jae-in and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un raise their hands after watching a mass games performance in Pyongyang on Wednesday.


Huh? How did I get here?
Return to Main Murray_Campbell Page
Subscribe to
The Globe and Mail

Email this article Print this article

space  Advertisement

Need CPR for your RSP? Check your portfolio’s pulse and lower yours by improving the overall health of your investments. Click here.


7-Day Site Search

Breaking News

Today's Weather


Rick Salutin
Merrily marching
off to war
Roy MacGregor
Duct tape might hold
when panic strikes

Where Manley is going with his first budget



For a columnist's most recent stories, click on their name below.


Roy MacGregor arrow
This Country
Jeffrey Simpson arrow
The Nation
Margaret Wente arrow
Hugh Winsor  arrow
The Power Game

Rob Carrick arrow
Personal Finance
Drew Fagan arrow
The Big Picture
Mathew Ingram arrow
Brent Jang arrow
Business West
Brian Milner arrow
Taking Stock
Eric Reguly arrow
To The Point
Andrew Willis arrow

Stephen Brunt arrow
The Game
Eric Duhatschek arrow
Allan Maki arrow
William Houston arrow
Truth & Rumours
Lorne Rubenstein arrow
 The Arts

John Doyle arrow
John MacLachlan Gray arrow
Gray's Anatomy
David Macfarlane arrow
Cheap Seats
Johanna Schneller arrow

Murray Campbell arrow
Ontario Politics
Lysiane Gagnon arrow
Inside Quebec
Marcus Gee arrow
The World
William Johnson arrow
Pit Bill
Paul Knox arrow
Heather Mallick arrow
As If
Leah McLaren arrow
Generation Why
Rex Murphy arrow
Japes of Wrath
Rick Salutin arrow
On The Other Hand
Paul Sullivan arrow
The West
William Thorsell arrow

Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels

© 2003 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Help & Contact Us | Back to the top of this page