Making the Business of Life Easier

   Finance globeinvestor   Careers globecareers.workopolis Subscribe to The Globe
The Globe and Mail/
Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

  This site      Tips


  The Web Google


  Where to Find It

Breaking News
  Home Page

  Report on Business



Read and Win Contest

Print Edition
  Front Page

  Report on Business




  Arts & Entertainment



  Headline Index

 Other Sections

  Births & Deaths






  Facts & Arguments




  Real Estate









  Food & Dining




  Online Personals

  TV Listings/News

 Specials & Series
  All Reports...

  Where to Find It
 A quick guide to what's available on the site



  Customer Service

  Help & Contact Us



 Web Site

  E-Mail Newsletters

  Free Headlines

  Help & Contact Us

  Make Us Home

  Mobile New

  Press Room

  Privacy Policy

  Terms & Conditions


Hollywood Goes To War

Hollywood, D.C
George W. Bush called last week, and Hollywood's executives answered. But Washington needn't have asked America's moviemakers to enlist in the war effort. As Doug Saunders reports, they've been doing it voluntarily for decades

Films of war
  • First World War
  • Second World War
  • Korean War
  • Vietnam War
  • Cold War

  • Quotes from war films
  • Read the quotes

  • Have your say
  • Tell us your favourite war movie, even if it's an anti-war film

  • Related links
  • War Movies: Guide Picks
  • The Greatest War Movies
  • The Art of War - The War Movie Poster Reserve
  • War and Anti-War Films
  • The War Movie Database
  • Stampville: War Films
  • By DOUG SAUNDERS, The Globe and Mail
    Saturday, November 17, 2001
    Page 3

    That all ended abruptly in 1941 (a little too abruptly for Harry Cohn, head of Columbia Pictures, who had been a close friend and admirer of Benito Mussolini). Much has been written in recent weeks about Hollywood's rapid switch, after Pearl Harbor, to government-financed war-propaganda efforts, morale-boosting films and war-bond drives. What is less often remembered is what happened to war movies after 1945, once the government funding was cut off and propaganda was no longer needed: They became even more flag-waving and simplistic. The template for postwar movies was set with John Wayne's The Sands of Iwo Jima in 1946, a dazzling tableau of multihued servicemen (in real life, they were segregated) in a thoroughly Americanized war. It set the stage for hundreds more Second World War epics over the next 10 years.

    The Cold War also won Hollywood's support, though not without some casualties: The blacklist of leftists in Hollywood was cruel and unnecessary, because the Hollywood studios did not show any interest in making films during the 1950s that questioned the period's Manichean outlook. It was not until the early 1960s that a few filmmakers were able to question the Cold War's logic - with films such as the fearsome Fail Safe (1964) and its more successful satire, Dr. Strangelove. The period's cinematic ethos is best captured in John Frankenheimer's 1962 paranoid masterpiece The Manchurian Candidate, whose scheming Koreans and invisible sleeper cells are both a perfect embodiment of the mood that swept both Hollywood and Washington, and a dazzling foreshadow of today's atmosphere.

    And although the phrase "Vietnam film" leads us to think of the antiwar messages of the late 1970s and 1980s, the films that were actually made during the Vietnam War were largely gung-ho: The Dirty Dozen, Green Berets (Wayne's 1968 southeast Asian reprise of The Sands of Iwo Jima), Patton. Only satirists were able to break through the khaki wall: Robert Altman's M.A.S.H. and Mike Nichols's Catch-22, both mockeries of U.S. military order, were hits in 1970, when U.S. public opinion had largely turned against the war.

    The Vietnam film as we know it did not begin until 1978, with Hal Ashby's Coming Home and Michael Cimino's The Deer Hunter. By this time, virtually everybody in the United States regretted Vietnam. The Hollywood studios once again were simply bolstering the American project. Nevertheless, this was a time of great artistic independence in Hollywood, largely because the studios were nearly bankrupt and it was widely assumed that cinema was a commercially dead art form. This interregnum allowed some wildly non-programmatic American visions to emerge, not the least of which was Francis Ford Coppola's Apocalypse Now (1979).

    7-Day Site Search

    Breaking News

    Today's Weather


    Michael Posner
    Ethnic laugh lines
    Jeffrey Simpson
    Health care: Do we know better than everyone else?

    Paul Knox
    The rise of anti-anti-Americanism


    Editorial Cartoon

    Click here for the Editorial Cartoon

    Home | Business | National | Int'l | Sports | Columnists | The Arts | Tech | Travel | TV | Wheels

    © 2003 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    Help & Contact Us | Back to the top of this page
    [an error occurred while processing this directive]