
We're building you a new Globe Investor that is smarter, faster and easier to use.
We'll be rolling out new sections, features and tools over the coming months.
David Berman
Globe Investor Magazine Online, February 19, 2009
Equity investing doesn't have to be
complex. Buy some good stocks and hold
on to them through good times and bad.
Every so often, however, something comes
along to challenge this strategy. Last year,
the challenge came from the fact that major
stock market indexes plunged about 40%,
sending U.S. stocks back to where they
were about a decade ago. Now, buy-andhold
investors are looking like suckers.
Is the strategy on the verge of dying?
It's certainly not the first time that longterm
investing has worn on investors'
patience. The current decade-long malaise
in stocks is relatively short compared to the
doldrums of 1966 to 1982. Back then, the
market was just coming off the 17-year bull
market that had begun with the postwar
boom in 1949, during which the Dow Jones
industrial average rose about 450%. That
boom led to unsustainable valuations on
stocks, much like the situation that
confronted equity markets at the end of the
1990s, and took years to unwind. The Dow
Jones industrial average started 1966 at
970; 16 years later, it was at the same level.
Yes, you would have made money from
dividends, but not enough to make stocks
the winner over government bonds.
However, there were many ups and
downs over this period-between 1974 and
1976, the Dow surged 75%, only to tumble
over the next year and a half-which is why
short-term investors believe that it's best to
be nimble: Stay invested on the upswings
and cash out at the top.
Trouble is, this isn't easy to do. Brad
Barber and Terrance Odean, professors at
the University of California, looked at the
impact of trading in the early- to mid-1990s
and found that frequent traders lagged both
the market and those investors who traded
less frequently, and by a substantial margin.
Need another reason to stick with the
buy-and-hold strategy? Warren Buffett, one
of the greatest living investors, is a vocal
supporter of this approach. Between 1966
and 1982, when the Dow went nowhere,
Buffett never had a down year and his
average annual performance was just shy
of 22%. How did he do it? He owned good
stocks, such as American Express and Walt
Disney, and held on to them through good
times and bad.